False News: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<h2>False News</h2> | <h2>False News</h2> | ||
<p>When Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 went missing on {{Day 001}} the airline was unable to provide information about its' location, the cause of the incident, the reason for no communication | <p>When Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 went missing on {{Day 001}} the airline was unable to provide information about its' location, the cause of the incident, or the reason for no communication and no distress call.</p> | ||
<p>When the Malaysian, Vietnamese and Singapore governments initiated a search of the South China Sea in the vicinity of MH370's last known location, but failed to find any evidence of a crashed aircraft the scale of an information void increased.</p> | <p>When the Malaysian, Vietnamese and Singapore governments initiated a search of the South China Sea in the vicinity of MH370's last known location, but failed to find any evidence of a crashed aircraft, the scale of an information void increased.</p> | ||
<p>When the Malaysian Air traffic controllers explained that the aircraft disappeared from secondary radar, meaning that the 'blip' on their screens disappeared, and the media interpreted that as the entire aircraft disappeared, the expanding information void started to be filled by speculation and 'conspiracy theories'.</p> | <p>When the Malaysian Air traffic controllers explained that the aircraft disappeared from secondary radar, meaning that the 'blip' on their screens disappeared, and the media interpreted that as the entire aircraft disappeared, the expanding information void started to be filled by speculation and 'conspiracy theories'.</p> | ||
<p>For example, since there were employees from the Freescale company onboard it was suggested that they used technology to hide the plane from radar. It was suggested that the pilot flew low to avoid tracking by radar.</p> | <p>For example, since there were employees from the Freescale company onboard it was suggested that they used technology to hide the plane from radar. It was also suggested that the pilot flew low to avoid tracking by radar.</p> | ||
<p>As it became known that the aircraft continued to fly for about six hours after contact was lost, and could have flown on either a northern or southern route termed corridors, there was speculation that it landed in Afghanistan, or that it landed at the Baikonur Cosmodrome.</p> | <p>As it became known that the aircraft continued to fly for about six hours after contact was lost, and could have flown on either a northern or southern route termed corridors, there was speculation that it landed in Afghanistan, or that it landed at the Baikonur Cosmodrome.</p> | ||
<p>After residents of an atoll in the Maldives reported seeing a low-flying jet aircraft with Malaysian colours various reporters, authors, blog writers and others propagated the idea that these people saw MH370, so the aircraft either crashed or was ditched somewhere near the Maldives, or was flown to the military base at Diego Garcia where it was either shot down, or landed and was hidden.</p> | <p>After residents of an atoll in the Maldives reported seeing a low-flying jet aircraft with Malaysian colours various reporters, authors, blog writers and others propagated the idea that these people saw MH370, so the aircraft either crashed or was ditched somewhere near the Maldives, or was flown to the military base at Diego Garcia where it was either shot down, or landed and was hidden.</p> | ||
<p> | <p>The earliest piece of misleading information was that the aircraft landed at Nanming. This was a social media post that was incorrect. Other examples of false or misleading news follow.</p> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<h5>Nanming</h5> | |||
<p> | <h5><div><html><a href="False News/Nanming" class="nav-btn pos-right">Landed at Nanming</a></html></div>Nanming</h5> | ||
<div class=" | <p>Early on the day that MH370 went missing, {{Day 001}} there was speculation on social media that the aircraft had landed at Nanming.</p> | ||
<p> | <p>News of any landing would have given relatives and friends of passengers some hope, but the news was false.</p> | ||
< | <br /> | ||
</div> < | |||
<h5><div><html><a href="False News/Crashed near Tho Chu Island" class="nav-btn pos-right" >Crashed near Tho Chu Island</a></html></div>Crashed into the sea near Tho Chu island, Vietnam</h3> | |||
<p>Citing sources in Vietnam, media published reports which 'confirmed' that Flight MH370 had crashed into the sea off Tho Chu island.</p> | |||
<p>For next-of-kin, family and friends this news would have created a devastating loss of hope. The emotional roller-coaster became worse when later reports indicated that the aircraft had not crashed but made a turn-back and continued flying - news which raised new hope, if only temporarily.</p> | |||
<br /> | |||
<h5><div><html><a href="False News/Two-Minute Phone Call" class="nav-btn pos-right">Two-Minute Phone Call</a></html></div>Two-Minute Phone Call</h5> | |||
<p>This story alleged that shortly before take-off the Pilot-in-Command, Captain Shah, received a call on his mobile phone. The caller was allegedly a woman who purchased a pay-as-you-go SIM card from a shop in Kuala Lumpur and used a false identity. The Royal Malaysia Police dismissed the article as mere speculation. The article is analysed in detail here and while it is obviously fabricated and false it is was republished many times and adds to the propaganda about the Captain.</p> | |||
<br /> | |||
<h5><div><html><a href="False News/Afghanistan" class="nav-btn pos-right">Hijacked and in Afghanistan</a></html></div>Hijacked and in Afghanistan</h5> | |||
<p>British tabloids are known for publishing sensational content, particularly if it can be attributed to another source. This article assertion that flight MH370 was flown to Afghanistan, landed and passengers were living in mud huts.</p> | |||
{{ShortLine}} | |||
[[Category:False News]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:57, 1 January 2025
False News
When Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 went missing on Saturday, 8 March 2014 the airline was unable to provide information about its' location, the cause of the incident, or the reason for no communication and no distress call.
When the Malaysian, Vietnamese and Singapore governments initiated a search of the South China Sea in the vicinity of MH370's last known location, but failed to find any evidence of a crashed aircraft, the scale of an information void increased.
When the Malaysian Air traffic controllers explained that the aircraft disappeared from secondary radar, meaning that the 'blip' on their screens disappeared, and the media interpreted that as the entire aircraft disappeared, the expanding information void started to be filled by speculation and 'conspiracy theories'.
For example, since there were employees from the Freescale company onboard it was suggested that they used technology to hide the plane from radar. It was also suggested that the pilot flew low to avoid tracking by radar.
As it became known that the aircraft continued to fly for about six hours after contact was lost, and could have flown on either a northern or southern route termed corridors, there was speculation that it landed in Afghanistan, or that it landed at the Baikonur Cosmodrome.
After residents of an atoll in the Maldives reported seeing a low-flying jet aircraft with Malaysian colours various reporters, authors, blog writers and others propagated the idea that these people saw MH370, so the aircraft either crashed or was ditched somewhere near the Maldives, or was flown to the military base at Diego Garcia where it was either shot down, or landed and was hidden.
The earliest piece of misleading information was that the aircraft landed at Nanming. This was a social media post that was incorrect. Other examples of false or misleading news follow.
Nanming
Early on the day that MH370 went missing, Saturday, 8 March 2014 there was speculation on social media that the aircraft had landed at Nanming.
News of any landing would have given relatives and friends of passengers some hope, but the news was false.
Crashed into the sea near Tho Chu island, Vietnam
Citing sources in Vietnam, media published reports which 'confirmed' that Flight MH370 had crashed into the sea off Tho Chu island.
For next-of-kin, family and friends this news would have created a devastating loss of hope. The emotional roller-coaster became worse when later reports indicated that the aircraft had not crashed but made a turn-back and continued flying - news which raised new hope, if only temporarily.
Two-Minute Phone Call
This story alleged that shortly before take-off the Pilot-in-Command, Captain Shah, received a call on his mobile phone. The caller was allegedly a woman who purchased a pay-as-you-go SIM card from a shop in Kuala Lumpur and used a false identity. The Royal Malaysia Police dismissed the article as mere speculation. The article is analysed in detail here and while it is obviously fabricated and false it is was republished many times and adds to the propaganda about the Captain.
Hijacked and in Afghanistan
British tabloids are known for publishing sensational content, particularly if it can be attributed to another source. This article assertion that flight MH370 was flown to Afghanistan, landed and passengers were living in mud huts.